
I should note, in case it wasn’t clear in my previous entry, that no one in my family is in any way affiliated with the University of Illinois, and we’re OK with that. We didn’t come here to go to school or get further degrees or to work at the University or anything. We chose to come here because it was a college town within easy distance of one of the world’s finest cities; we came here because there was a vibrant music scene, a chance to work in it, decent school districts, and low cost of living. And, yes, OK, Big Ten sports (you can take the girl out of Minnesota, etc). If anyone ever becomes affiliated with the U of I, it’ll most likely be the kids.
I am Townie.
******
I hear quite a bit about “alone time” or “me-time”. The last time I really had any such thing - which
to me means I am free mentally as well as physically of obligations to others - was before I had children. Nirvana’s
Nevermind was rapidly ascending the charts (to the morbid fascination of me and everyone around me) the last time I had alone time. Oh, if only I hadn’t frittered away so much of my alone time - I didn’t even
know it was my alone time. It was just my
life, for God’s sake. So I guess I wasn’t frittering it away. I was living.
Anyway.
I now live with my husband, my 15 year-old, my 9 year-old, four cats, and a guinea pig in a small house. No, not a
“not-so-big house” - a small house. Its square footage, if you don’t count the “garden apartment” (uh, basement) is somewhere around 1100 feet. The basement, half of which is finished off enough to be acceptable as living quarters, adds maybe another 500. Either way, we can’t have more than 4 people over for dinner, unless we eat outside. It’s a cute, strong, sturdy, old, well-built little house, kind of like the one from one of my childhood favorites:

Right now, I experience what passes for alone time in the morning, after everyone has gone to work and school. I deliberately am the last to leave just so I can enjoy the lack of physical/emotional presence of any humans in the house. I love my humans a great deal, but that silence, that utter REMOVAL of all traces of kinetic activity and mental vibration, is something I marvel at every morning for a half-hour or so.
I sit at my desk (see above) and putter for awhile. I listen to the news on NPR without the 15 YO interrupting to offer his opinion about what’s going on in Pakistan (I mean, he’s a cool kid, right on top of it, but it can get to be a little much before 8 AM). I do my grooming in peace and make my lunch to take to my office.
It’s the only time I’m alone with myself every day. I dig it, because I’m
alone in my space, this tiny house I share with so many others. I get some almost-alone time without the sometimes intrusive vibes from other people (and the constant distraction - if I’m by myself and I want to find people? I go to my
cafe). I relish this half-hour every morning, rain or shine. It’s far more luxurious than you might think.
*****
I find myself coming back, always, to certain topics/themes when I blog. Family, community, education, natural resources, consumerism, food, sustainability, history. I guess it’s my way of trying to make sense of what the HELL is going on around here while at the same time telling tiny stories. I probably won’t blog about national politics/the election as much as I did in 2004; national politics are ruinous of spirit and thoroughly uninspiring to me now. It doesn’t mean I don’t care; it means I don’t want to go specifically there while here. It means that I’ve seen what working at the local, grassroots level can do. Change takes time, and it takes individual discipline, not big fixes by millionaire men and women whom I doubt have anyone’s best interests at heart (except their own).
I found a book while thrifting not long ago - published in 1977,
Progress as If Survival Mattered is a compendium of essays by some heavy hitters/thinkers from the 70s. Categories for essays include population, energy, agriculture/food/nutrition, transportation, education, media, war/defense, and many others. I began thumbing through it recently, thinking I’d get walloped with some sort of 70s nostalgia trip, like I was watching
Schoolhouse Rock. That it’d be quaint. That, you know, despite the mess we’re in now,
we’ve come a long way, baby.
I wish everyone could read this book - this book! It came out when I was in third or fourth grade. There were public service announcements on the teevee back then, and we had a President who admonished people to put on sweaters if they were cold rather than turn up the heat. Cars got good gas mileage. People were interested in conservation and the future because it was good common sense to be interested in these things. This book was filled with hope that the next thirty years could turn things around, that we’d realize the folly of so many of our ways and start doing the right things base don the evidence all around us, that community and education and conservation and helping each other out would be the difference - but it made no bones about the fact that the next 30 years would be crucial. It was a roadmap, not some meow-meow document. As I was reading, I realized that we haven’t come far at all, that we’ve frittered away thirty freaking years, and that we probably don’t have thirty more to make the changes we should have been making already.
But.
The other day I realized that reducing/reusing/repurposing/recycling, learning to grow and cook things, learning to make things and to improvise solutions, learning to self-educate, and getting to know the neighbors - these are activities/concepts that an entire industry has sprung up around, catering to the middle class and affluent. But they’re all concepts that are crucial in a conserver/”poor” culture and aren’t that common in the mainstream of an affluent one. I’m wishing they taught more of that in school, because I suspect those are the skills that are going to be most important, no matter how things shake out. Who will have the skills?
Image by Eric Drooker
*****
And, finally, in the
oh, please department, I give you this:
An Illinois police officer who is suspected in the disappearance of his fourth wife said Wednesday that she had asked him for a divorce - but he thought it was due to hormones.
…
“I’m not trying to be funny, but Stacy would ask me for divorce after her sister died on a regular basis,” Peterson said. “It was based on her menstrual cycle.”
Article can be found
here.
Seriously?